����ý

“Beyond the Elements,” a series on the PBS series “Nova” program (produced by WGBH Boston), celebrates the wonders of chemistry – including synthetic rubbers and plastics. (Photo credits: Messier Cutting Systems, rtemegorov/Pond5, DimaBalanFilms/Pond5, 2020 WGBH Educational Foundation)

It’s not often that we see plastics presented in a positive light in the popular media, and even less often seeing a TV host giddy with pleasure in seeing a chemical reaction producing nylon in a laboratory beaker.

Imagine my surprise, then, when I tuned into an episode of the PBS TV series “Nova” last week titled, “Beyond the Elements: Indestructible” -- a rebroadcast of a show from a year ago as part of a series on the wonders of chemistry. I was prepared by the program blurb for a denunciation of synthetic materials that are “indestructible” pollutants in our land and water. All the more so when the opening scenes included statements about “The menagerie of modern plastics that is both a miracle and a menace.” And, “Rubber and plastics – materials we’ve come to depend on but that sometimes come with difficult environmental downsides.”

Featured Content

A Simpler Way to Calculate Shot Size vs. Barrel Capacity READ MORE

ColorForm From KraussMaffei Brings Key Competencies to One System READ MORE

How Vacuum Drying Is Revolutionizing Plastics Processing READ MORE

However, the majority of the program took a much more positive approach toward the wonders of materials science. The jovial and enthusiastic host, science and technology author David Pogue, approached the concept of “indestructibility” from the angle of manmade materials that demonstrate almost miraculous feats of durability. He started with tempered glass that can be pounded with a hammer and proceeded to a spray-on polyurea elastomer coating that when subjected to all sorts of abuse proved … well, indestructible. The he proceeded to plastics, focusing mainly on nylon and polyurethane foam.

Interestingly, the segment of the show on plastics (which came well after the halfway mark of this hour-long show) spent most of its time demonstrating lab-scale production of nylon 66 and PUR foam, which delighted Pogue with the slimy skein of polyamide he pulled continuously out of a beaker and with the effusion of foam cascading out of a beaker and over the lab bench. In fact, each segment of the show on glass, rubber and plastics was a lucid little chemistry lesson, enlivened by clever animations that made my memories of college chemistry seem like a primitive relic of a distant past (pretty distant, I must confess).

But after the “fun with chemistry” segment on plastics, Pogue delivered the grim news that only 9% of annual plastics production globally is recycled, the rest going to landfills, incineration or otherwise polluting the planet. Pogue went on to interview a chemistry professor at the University of Georgia, who lamented our society’s addiction to single-use plastics: “Is that really a way to design packaging – to have a material you use for 10 seconds and it goes to a landfill for a thousand years?” He then showed Pogue that “even packaging that looks recyclable, like paper takeout food containers, may not be because the are coated with plastic to make them impermeable to moisture and grease. Then he presented the good news that paper can be coated with PHA biopolymer to provide the desired performance while being biodegradable. Unfortunately, the professor pointed out, PHA is still too expensive for such applications.

The professor then pointed an accusing finger at a sector of the plastics industry that markets products like plastic bags as “biodegradable,” when they fall far short of that description in practical terms. “Absolute greenwashing,” concluded the professor. “Seems like a total scam,” agreed the appalled host.

Nonetheless, Pogue ended on a hopeful note: “We can make materials that last more than a human lifetime – and now we’re drowning in them. But attitudes are changing. The human ingenuity that helped create the crisis may help solve it as well.”

A reasonably balanced assessment – way more so than the standard fare I’m used to in the popular media. I didn’t find anything inaccurate in the presentation, and I would recommend it to anyone that hopes to enchant young people with the promise and possibilities of industrial chemistry to accomplish amazing feats and improve our lives.