Strategic Workforce Management Supports the Moldmaking Industry
NPE2024: Kruse presents its workforce management framework for optimized organization and management of human resources.
Share
Read Next

Source: Kruse Analysis Inc.
Injection molding simulation service and technology provider shares the key to organization within a company lies in its tactical management of human resources.
Kruse Analysis’ ATR (attract, train and retain) framework offers a complete approach to optimized workforce management. According to the company, the first step is attracting the best talent, followed by honing their skills via practical training to ensure a long-term company commitment.
This strategy is in tune with evolving workplace dynamics and promotes continued learning and improvement within an organization.
Kruse Training implements eLearning complete with virtual reality training methods for recruiting and developing a skilled engineering workforce. In today’s modern world, the prevalence of technology makes clear that quick learning is key to asserting a competitive edge in mold design and moldmaking.
The company says eLearning techniques in the moldmaking industry are the first steps toward a more sustainable economy. The progression includes technological advancements, cost-effectiveness and resource optimization, accessibility and inclusivity and the impact on employee productivity and retention. These factors encapsulate the reason why this advanced and strategic workforce management in the moldmaking industry is successful.
Related Content
-
Back to Basics on Mold Venting (Part 1)
Here’s what you need to know to improve the quality of your parts and to protect your molds.
-
Using Data to Pinpoint Cosmetic Defect Causes in Injection Molded Parts
Taking a step back and identifying the root cause of a cosmetic flaw can help molders focus on what corrective actions need to be taken.
-
Understanding the Effect of Pressure Losses on Injection Molded Parts
The compressibility of plastics as a class of materials means the pressure punched into the machine control and the pressure the melt experiences at the end of fill within the mold will be very different. What does this difference mean for process consistency and part quality?